How can groups use collective intelligence to allow for individuals to make better decisions?
I’ve been using Waze for a few weeks now. I have been using it ( to my own fault ) to try and figure out a better way out of San Francisco during a Giants game. Spoiler Alert – there is no fast route. However, in theory I wonder why more apps are not allowing us to make better decisions?
Rating sites like Yelp or even the way we view trending content online are one thing, but real time data being solved by multiple people passively is quite amazing – and another animal all together.
Waze is amazing because the network of users only exists to save everyone time and make their lives better. Many sharing services ( look up Sharing Economy ) are meant to redistribute assets or unwanted goods – not time or ideas. Crowdsourcing of labor is a great new frontier.
Two other projects also come to mind – not new, but worth discussing.
1. BOINC – using distributed grids for computing – Think SETI@home but bigger.
2. Tomnod – Using distributed volunteers for mapping
So the one outstanding question remains – Is collective intelligence accurate? If the data set is biased and/or wrong, knowledge based on bad data is not really helpful.
There is an obvious benefit from utilizing natural experiments to improve the human condition. Any app that helps me spend less time on the car and more time with my family is a winner. I am pondering how crowds can band together to solve other issues and help each other in this manner with minor effort. In the age of social networks, we have the largest networked grid of intelligence and assets – what do we want to do with them and who gives guidance / moderation to these networks to prevent them from being a mob?
Good vs Better 